![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Flood risk management strategies should look to a range of interventions, and include action to reduce runoff by working with natural practices to slow water, and increase infiltration and storage throughout the catchment.It is also important to note that dredging can be a conservation tool, particularly in heavily modified environments where natural processes that maintain ecosystem function are constrained.These impacts can be significant and permanent. O Loss of wildlife and habitats both within the river and across the wider floodplain. O Destabilising river banks, causing erosion and so risking damage to infrastructure. O Increasing flood risk for communities downstream by speeding up the movement of flood water through the river and drainage network. Numerous studies have pointed to significant unintended consequences of dredging, namely:.This is borne out by studies of the Somerset Level and Moors system which suggest that the proposed dredge would have not prevented flooding but could significantly reduce the length of time water stands on the land.However, there is significant evidence that dredging can increase channel conveyance, reducing water levels and small floods. It would be infeasible to dredge channels with the capacity to carry flood flows of the kind witnessed this winter (2013/14).In its most extreme form dredging may be used to re-align river channels creating linear, canalised watercourses. The term dredging is routinely used to refer to the systematic removal of accumulated material from river or other watercourse channels. It should be considered in the context of a range of tools and the origins of different sources of flood water, and comes with significant risks that must be understood at a local and catchment scale. Dredging can play an important role in flood risk management in some cases, but is not a standalone ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |